Tuesday, 11 May 2010
New Evaluation grade: 18/20
Much better. I know it seems you did all that work for only 4 more marks but it's definitley worth it because you were in level 3 with the video evaluation. The blog version has much more detail and is very nicely presented. It demonstrates an excellent understanding in most areas - audience feedback is weaker than other areas preventing you from achieving full marks.
Monday, 10 May 2010
Sunday, 9 May 2010
Production work: 40/60
Film: 26/40
Proficient in most areas - some issues with sound level when dialogue is spoken.
Poster: 7/10
Good use of conventions but one main convention ignored - we should see the characters faces. They also don't exactly look like they're about to 'collide'.
Radio advert: 7/10
Nice idea, follows conventions. Straightforward.
Proficient in most areas - some issues with sound level when dialogue is spoken.
Poster: 7/10
Good use of conventions but one main convention ignored - we should see the characters faces. They also don't exactly look like they're about to 'collide'.
Radio advert: 7/10
Nice idea, follows conventions. Straightforward.
Friday, 7 May 2010
Evaluation draft feedback:14/20
The content shows an excellent understanding in all areas but the video doesn't showcase excellent technical skill! You would have been better writing this up as a blog with illustrations. As a video, it should have been set up with a better frame and cut with images from your project - definately no script being passed from person to person!
Planning grade: 20/20
WWW:
Your work is excellent - on key concepts, audience, technical codes and the animate. Well done. Production had excellent planning throughout. Excellent presentation of work also.
Your work is excellent - on key concepts, audience, technical codes and the animate. Well done. Production had excellent planning throughout. Excellent presentation of work also.
Thursday, 18 March 2010
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)